In 1995 scientists from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
discovered that a particular alteration in the breast cancer gene
called BRCA1 was present in 1 percent of the general Jewish
population. The researchers did a follow-up study in 1996 to
estimate the cancer risk associated with this alteration as well
as two other alterations subsequently reported to be present in
the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The following questions
and answers serve as background information for the
follow-up study published in the May 15, 1997 issue of The
New England Journal of Medicine.
What was the purpose of the study?
The primary purpose of the study was to estimate the risk of
cancer associated with having three specific alterations in the
breast cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. The study was
conducted in the Washington, D.C. Ashkenazi Jewish
population (Jews from eastern or central Europe). Two of the
alterations tested were in the BRCA1 gene (185delAG and
5382insC) and one in the BRCA2 gene (6174delT).
The researchers tested the DNA in blood provided by a
finger-prick to see which of the more than 5,000 volunteers
had an alteration. Then, using the family cancer histories
reported by the volunteers, the scientists estimated the cancer
risk by comparing the histories of cancer in the relatives of the
volunteers with the alteration to the histories of cancer in the
relatives of the volunteers without the alteration.
What was unique about the current study?
This was the first study to test directly the DNA from
volunteers who are outside cancer-prone families and estimate
the cancer risk associated with each alteration. For years,
researchers have studied families with breast cancer
throughout several generations to help identify the altered
genes passed on from one generation to the next.
This was the first community-based study where people with
varying degrees of family cancer history participated. In fact,
three-quarters of the volunteers had no personal or close
family history of breast or ovarian cancer and 30 percent were
men. About 8 percent of the women were breast or ovarian
cancer survivors.
Earlier, the scientists involved in the new study tested for one
of the alterations (185delAG) in anonymous stored blood
samples from the general Jewish population. Even though the
frequencies they found were unexpectedly high (see references
in question 4), it was impossible to estimate the cancer risk
associated with the alterations because the cancer history of the
blood donors was not known.
This study was designed both to test for the frequency of the
alterations and to find out if volunteers from the general
population with an alteration were at greater risk for cancer
than those without an alteration.
What is known about the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes?
Because family history is the strongest single predictor of a
woman's chance of developing breast cancer, researchers
turned to cancer-prone families -- those with a high incidence
of cancer in several generations -- to find specific inherited
gene alterations that are passed on from one generation to the
next. After a long search, two genes were found that are
altered in many families with hereditary breast cancer. The
first, BRCA1 (for BReast CAncer gene), was discovered in
1994, and the second, BRCA2, in 1995. The search for other
genes continues.
Within families with cancer in multiple generations, it had
been estimated previously that a woman with an alteration in
the BRCA1 gene has about an 85 percent chance of
developing breast cancer and a 44 percent chance of
developing ovarian cancer by age 70. Prior research in these
high-risk families reported that women with BRCA2
alterations have a lower risk of developing both breast and
ovarian cancer than women with BRCA1 alterations. Previous
studies had reported an increased risk of colon and prostate
cancer associated with alteration carriers in these same
families.
Most alterations result in a shortened protein product which
scientists assume prevents the protein from carrying out its
normal function in the cell. The precise biological roles of
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not known.
Once the genes were isolated, it was possible to analyze the
specific alterations inherited in each cancer-prone family.
Today over 100 different alterations scattered throughout
BRCA1 have been identified. In general, most families have a
unique alteration. A similar pattern is emerging for BRCA2
alterations seen in cancer-prone families; a large number of
distinct, family-specific alterations are scattered through the
gene.
The initial impetus for the current study was the observation in
late 1994 that three high-risk Ashkenazi families studied at the
NIH carried an identical alteration in BRCA1 (185delAG).
These families were not known to be related. This observation
led to the study which found that1 percent of the Jewish
population has this alteration. This was the first alteration
associated with a particular ethnic group. A few other
alterations frequently occurring in other ethnic groups
(Icelandic, Norweigan, and Dutch) have been found since then
and are now being studied.
Why were these particular alterations chosen to be
tested?
Of the more than 100 alterations identified in each gene
(BRCA1 and BRCA2) in families with hereditary breast
cancer, a few are found in subgroups of the general
population. In particular, three alterations were initially
identified in Ashkenazi families with hereditary breast cancer
and later were found in an unusually high percentage of the
general Jewish population. The estimated frequencies of the
three alterations in the general Ashkenazi population are listed
below:
| Gene |
Alteration |
Frequency in Ashkenazi Jews* |
| BRCA 1 |
185deIAG |
1.0 percent |
| 5382insC |
0.1 percent |
| BRCA2 |
6174deIT |
1.4 percent |
In comparison, the percentage of people in the general U.S.
population that have any mutation in BRCA1 has been
estimated to be between 0.1- 0.6 percent.
*Nature Genetics 1995; 11: 198-200 and Nature Genetics 1996; 14:
185-187, 188-190.
What were the findings of the current study?
This study:
- supported previous studies testing the frequency of
three BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations in the general
Jewish population: The frequencies reported in the
current study are consistent with those previously
reported for the general Jewish population. The
DNA analysis in the new study showed that 120 of
the 5318 volunteers had one of the three alterations
or about 1 person in 44 (2.3 percent). No individual
carried more than one of the three alterations. By
comparison, the frequency of all BRCA1 and
BRCA2 alterations combined in the non-Jewish
population is less than 1 percent.
- estimated the average risk of breast and ovarian
cancer associated with three BRCA1 and BRCA2
alterations in the general Ashkenazi population: The
researchers found that women carrying one of the
three alterations have on average a 56 percent chance
of getting breast cancer by the age of 70 (compared
with a 13 percent chance without the alterations) and
a 16 percent chance of getting ovarian cancer by age
70 (compared with a 1.6 percent chance for
non-carriers). In other words, the researchers
estimate that by the age of 70, slightly more than half
of all women with an alteration will develop breast
cancer and about one out of every six carriers will
develop ovarian cancer.
- found breast and ovarian cancer risks well below
previous estimates: Until now, small studies of
families with cancer in several generations had
estimated that women with an alteration had a 76
percent to 87 percent chance of developing breast
cancer; for ovarian cancer, the estimated risk ranged
from 11 percent to 84 percent.
- confirmed the link between prostate cancer and the
alterations: Previous studies had suggested a link
between BRCA1 and prostate cancer. The current
study confirmed this association and showed a
significant excess of prostate cancer among men
with the alterations.
- estimated the prostate cancer risk in the general
Jewish population: Men carrying one of the three
alterations have on average a 16 percent chance of
getting prostate cancer (compared with a 1.6 percent
chance for non-carriers) by the age of 70. In other
words, by age 70 the researchers estimate that about
one out of every six men carrying an alteration will
develop prostate cancer.
- found the average risks for breast, ovarian, and
prostate cancers: The study estimated the average
risk of cancer for alteration carriers. The cancer risk
for an individual man or woman who carries one of
the alterations may be higher or lower than the
average.
- found no link with colon cancer: A previous report
showed a link between BRCA1 alterations and colon
cancer that was not confirmed in the current study.
found that each alteration carries a similar breast
cancer risk: Previous reports suggested that the risk
of getting breast cancer was different for two of the
alterations studied. Specifically, in studies involving
Jewish early-onset breast cancer patients, data
suggested that the risk associated with the 6174delT
mutation (in BRCA2) was considerably lower than
the risk associated with 185delAG. In the current
study, the risk associated with the 6174delT was
slightly lower, but the risks for the three alterations
were not significantly different from each other.
found that the three alterations account for only a
small proportion of breast cancer cases in Jewish
women: Of the women in this study who were breast
or ovarian cancer survivors, only 9 percent had one
of the alterations. In fact, only about 7 percent of
breast cancer in Jewish women is due to the three
alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
How is inherited breast cancer different from other
genetic diseases?
On average, by the age of 70 women with one of the
alterations tested for in this study have about a 50 percent
chance of being diagnosed with breast cancer and 16 percent
chance of developing ovarian cancer. Men with an alteration
have about a 16 percent chance of developing prostate cancer
by the age of 70. However, for any individual with an
alteration, a precise estimate of risk is not possible.
Family history helps to place an individual's cancer risk in
perspective, but is also an imperfect tool. For example,
family history will be most useful in determining risk if a
carrier has multiple relatives affected with breast or ovarian
cancer. In this case, a woman's risk of breast cancer may be
higher than the average of 56 percent.
If a carrier has little or no family history of breast and ovarian
cancer, his or her risk will be much more difficult to assess.
This is particularly true of women in small families with very
few close female relatives.
Unless someone already has a strong family history of breast
or ovarian cancer, it will be very difficult to know his or her
precise risk until other risk factors for cancer are identified.
Are further studies planned with the Jewish
population in the Washington D.C. area?
Yes. The NIH researchers are developing a follow-up study
in the greater Washington, D.C. Jewish community with an
option to be tested and receive individual test results for the
three alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. All participants will
receive counseling as to the risks and benefits of genetic
testing. This study will also try to identify risk factors that
might interact with BRCA1 and BRCA2 and modify
someone's chance of getting breast, ovarian, and prostate
cancer. Risk factors under consideration are hormonal factors
and additional gene alterations.
Are NIH scientists planning any studies involving
alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes that are
unique to other ethnic groups?
No. Although certain alterations that may be unique to
Norwegian, Icelandic, and Dutch families have been
identified, the frequency in the general population is not
known, and no such studies have been planned to date.
What are the implications of this study for
non-Jewish populations?
This is the first community-based study to estimate the cancer
risk associated with alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the
general population. The researchers found that the risks for
breast and ovarian cancer were lower on average in this
population than in hereditary breast cancer families. Even
though there is no data for other ethnic groups, the
researchers speculate that future findings may be similar; that
is, it is likely that most alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 that
produce a shortened protein product will increase the cancer
risk in the general population, but the average risk will
probably not be as high as in cancer-prone families.
Do the results have implications for Jews getting
tested for these alterations?
The decision of whether to be tested for a gene alteration is
complex and personal. One of the factors to be considered is
the cancer risk associated with having a positive or negative
test result.
Based on this study, the average risk of breast, ovarian, and
prostate cancer for people with BRCA1 and BRCA2
alterations is known more accurately. For example, the
average risk of breast cancer is lower than previously
thought, but is still significantly higher than for those who
don't carry the alteration.
But gene alterations linked to cancer do not have the same
effect on each person who carries them. For example, the
findings from this study suggest that nearly half of the
women with these alterations may never develop cancer. And
since BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations account for only a
small portion of breast cancer, many women without an
alteration will develop breast cancer.
Part of the complexity of someone's decision to be tested is
that the medical consequences of an individual's test result --
positive or negative -- are not predictable. This is especially
true of a carrier who does not have a personal or family
history of cancer.
Besides the cancer risks, other considerations are important.
There may be psychological and social effects of both
positive and negative results for the individual tested and
family members. Individuals should also consider how a
positive or negative result might affect them and their
relatives, especially if they have a strong history of cancer in
the family.
In addition, privacy issues are important, since it is possible
that having a positive or negative result may affect health
insurance and employment.
Until recently, genetic testing for alterations that increase
susceptibility to cancer was performed only in a research
setting. With the past year, however, this kind of testing has
become commercially available. Still, there is no consensus
about the circumstances in which genetic testing might be
useful, and this kind of testing is certainly not routine.
Scientists and physicians are still uncertain about how best to
help alteration carriers. Even if the precise risk of cancer for
an individual carrier were known, there are no proven
effective risk reduction strategies. And physicians are not
sure about the best ways to monitor those at high risk to
assure early detection if they do develop cancer. More
research is needed.
Do these results have implications for the
prevention or treatment of breast, ovarian, or
prostate cancer?
The hope is that these gene alterations as well as any others
discovered in future studies will provide novel targets for the
development of anticancer drugs. The interaction between the
alterations and environmental factors may also present new
strategies for cancer prevention.
For more information about genetic testing...
Several documents about genetics and genetic testing are
available on this website at Detection, Prevention, and
Genetics Information. The site includes:
- a directory of genetic counselors, physicians,
geneticists, and nurses who have expertise in genetic
testing and who will accept physicians' referrals for
familial cancer risk counseling and/or genetic
susceptibility testing. Because the issues
surrounding genetic testing are highly personal and
can have far-reaching consequences, a health
professional trained in genetics is a good resource
for exploring these issues.
- position papers of several professional and advocacy
organizations on the issue of genetic testing for
susceptibility to cancer as well as fact sheet on
genetics.
- "PDQ Screening and Prevention Information" is a
document "Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk." PDQ
is NCI's cancer information database.
Another resource is NCI's Cancer Information Service
(CIS). By calling the CIS at 1-800-4-CANCER or
1-800-422-6237. The staff can send printed information and
answer questions about cancer and cancer genetics. The CIS
can also identify facilities offering cancer risk assessment,
counseling related to familial cancer and genetic susceptibility
to cancer, and centers conducting research.
For more information see the press release "Three Breast
Cancer Gene Alterations in Jewish Community Carry
Increased Cancer Risk, but Lower Than in Previous
Studies".