In 1995 scientists from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) discovered that a particular alteration in the breast cancer gene called BRCA1 was present in 1 percent of the general Jewish population. The researchers did a follow-up study in 1996 to estimate the cancer risk associated with this alteration as well as two other alterations subsequently reported to be present in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The following questions and answers serve as background information for the follow-up study published in the May 15, 1997 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.
The primary purpose of the study was to estimate the risk of cancer associated with having three specific alterations in the breast cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. The study was conducted in the Washington, D.C. Ashkenazi Jewish population (Jews from eastern or central Europe). Two of the alterations tested were in the BRCA1 gene (185delAG and 5382insC) and one in the BRCA2 gene (6174delT).
The researchers tested the DNA in blood provided by a finger-prick to see which of the more than 5,000 volunteers had an alteration. Then, using the family cancer histories reported by the volunteers, the scientists estimated the cancer risk by comparing the histories of cancer in the relatives of the volunteers with the alteration to the histories of cancer in the relatives of the volunteers without the alteration.
Top of page
This was the first study to test directly the DNA from volunteers who are outside cancer-prone families and estimate the cancer risk associated with each alteration. For years, researchers have studied families with breast cancer throughout several generations to help identify the altered genes passed on from one generation to the next.
This was the first community-based study where people with varying degrees of family cancer history participated. In fact, three-quarters of the volunteers had no personal or close family history of breast or ovarian cancer and 30 percent were men. About 8 percent of the women were breast or ovarian cancer survivors.
Earlier, the scientists involved in the new study tested for one of the alterations (185delAG) in anonymous stored blood samples from the general Jewish population. Even though the frequencies they found were unexpectedly high (see references in question 4), it was impossible to estimate the cancer risk associated with the alterations because the cancer history of the blood donors was not known.
This study was designed both to test for the frequency of the alterations and to find out if volunteers from the general population with an alteration were at greater risk for cancer than those without an alteration.
Top of page
Because family history is the strongest single predictor of a woman's chance of developing breast cancer, researchers turned to cancer-prone families - those with a high incidence of cancer in several generations - to find specific inherited gene alterations that are passed on from one generation to the next. After a long search, two genes were found that are altered in many families with hereditary breast cancer. The first, BRCA1 (for BReast CAncer gene), was discovered in 1994, and the second, BRCA2, in 1995. The search for other genes continues.
Within families with cancer in multiple generations, it had been estimated previously that a woman with an alteration in the BRCA1 gene has about an 85 percent chance of developing breast cancer and a 44 percent chance of developing ovarian cancer by age 70. Prior research in these high-risk families reported that women with BRCA2 alterations have a lower risk of developing both breast and ovarian cancer than women with BRCA1 alterations. Previous studies had reported an increased risk of colon and prostate cancer associated with alteration carriers in these same families.
Most alterations result in a shortened protein product which scientists assume prevents the protein from carrying out its normal function in the cell. The precise biological roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not known.
Once the genes were isolated, it was possible to analyze the specific alterations inherited in each cancer-prone family. Today over 100 different alterations scattered throughout BRCA1 have been identified. In general, most families have a unique alteration. A similar pattern is emerging for BRCA2 alterations seen in cancer-prone families; a large number of distinct, family-specific alterations are scattered through the gene.
The initial impetus for the current study was the observation in late 1994 that three high-risk Ashkenazi families studied at the NIH carried an identical alteration in BRCA1 (185delAG). These families were not known to be related. This observation led to the study which found that 1 percent of the Jewish population has this alteration. This was the first alteration associated with a particular ethnic group. A few other alterations frequently occurring in other ethnic groups (Icelandic, Norweigan and Dutch) have been found since then and are now being studied.
Top of page
Of the more than 100 alterations identified in each gene (BRCA1 and BRCA2) in families with hereditary breast cancer, a few are found in subgroups of the general population. In particular, three alterations were initially identified in Ashkenazi families with hereditary breast cancer and later were found in an unusually high percentage of the general Jewish population. The estimated frequencies of the three alterations in the general Ashkenazi population are listed below:
In comparison, the percentage of people in the general U.S. population that have any mutation in BRCA1 has been estimated to be between 0.1 - 0.6 percent.
*Nature Genetics 1995; 11: 198-200 and Nature Genetics 1996; 14: 185-187, 188-190.
Top of page
Top of page
On average, by the age of 70, women with one of the alterations tested for in this study have about a 50 percent chance of being diagnosed with breast cancer and 16 percent chance of developing ovarian cancer. Men with an alteration have about a 16 percent chance of developing prostate cancer by the age of 70. However, for any individual with an alteration, a precise estimate of risk is not possible.
Family history helps to place an individual's cancer risk in perspective, but is also an imperfect tool. For example, family history will be most useful in determining risk if a carrier has multiple relatives affected with breast or ovarian cancer. In this case, a woman's risk of breast cancer may be higher than the average of 56 percent.
If a carrier has little or no family history of breast and ovarian cancer, his or her risk will be much more difficult to assess. This is particularly true of women in small families with very few close female relatives.
Unless someone already has a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer, it will be very difficult to know his or her precise risk until other risk factors for cancer are identified.
Top of page
Yes. The NIH researchers are developing a follow-up study in the greater Washington, D.C. Jewish community with an option to be tested and receive individual test results for the three alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. All participants will receive counseling as to the risks and benefits of genetic testing. This study will also try to identify risk factors that might interact with BRCA1 and BRCA2 and modify someone's chance of getting breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. Risk factors under consideration are hormonal factors and additional gene alterations.
Top of page
No. Although certain alterations that may be unique to Norwegian, Icelandic and Dutch families have been identified, the frequency in the general population is not known, and no such studies have been planned to date.
Top of page
This is the first community-based study to estimate the cancer risk associated with alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the general population. The researchers found that the risks for breast and ovarian cancer were lower on average in this population than in hereditary breast cancer families. Even though there is no data for other ethnic groups, the researchers speculate that future findings may be similar; that is, it is likely that most alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 that produce a shortened protein product will increase the cancer risk in the general population, but the average risk will probably not be as high as in cancer-prone families.
Top of page
The decision of whether to be tested for a gene alteration is complex and personal. One of the factors to be considered is the cancer risk associated with having a positive or negative test result.
Based on this study, the average risk of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer for people with BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations is known more accurately. For example, the average risk of breast cancer is lower than previously thought, but is still significantly higher than for those who don't carry the alteration.
But gene alterations linked to cancer do not have the same effect on each person who carries them. For example, the findings from this study suggest that nearly half of the women with these alterations may never develop cancer. And since BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations account for only a small portion of breast cancer, many women without an alteration will develop breast cancer.
Part of the complexity of someone's decision to be tested is that the medical consequences of an individual's test result - positive or negative - are not predictable. This is especially true of a carrier who does not have a personal or family history of cancer.
Besides the cancer risks, other considerations are important. There may be psychological and social effects of both positive and negative results for the individual tested and family members. Individuals should also consider how a positive or negative result might affect them and their relatives, especially if they have a strong history of cancer in the family.
In addition, privacy issues are important, since it is possible that having a positive or negative result may affect health insurance and employment.
Until recently, genetic testing for alterations that increase susceptibility to cancer was performed only in a research setting. With the past year, however, this kind of testing has become commercially available. Still, there is no consensus about the circumstances in which genetic testing might be useful, and this kind of testing is certainly not routine.
Scientists and physicians are still uncertain about how best to help alteration carriers. Even if the precise risk of cancer for an individual carrier were known, there are no proven effective risk reduction strategies. And physicians are not sure about the best ways to monitor those at high risk to assure early detection if they do develop cancer. More research is needed.
Top of page
The hope is that these gene alterations as well as any others discovered in future studies will provide novel targets for the development of anticancer drugs. The interaction between the alterations and environmental factors may also present new strategies for cancer prevention.
Several documents about genetics and genetic testing are available on this Web site at Detection, Prevention and Genetics Information [cancer.gov].
Another resource is NCI's Cancer Information Service (CIS). By calling the CIS at 1-800-4-CANCER or 1-800-422-6237. The staff can send printed information and answer questions about cancer and cancer genetics. The CIS can also identify facilities, offering cancer risk assessment, counseling related to familial cancer and genetic susceptibility to cancer, and centers conducting research.
Three Breast Cancer Gene Alterations in Jewish Community Carry Increased Cancer Risk, but Lower Than in Previous Studies
Top of page
Last Reviewed: June 1, 2012