Genome Statute and Legislation Database
The Genome Statute and Legislation Database is comprised of state statutes and bills introduced during the 2002-2024 U.S. state legislative sessions.
State | Primary Link | Topic(s) | Bill Status Sort descending | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|
Massachusetts | 2021 State Bills Massachusetts 2021 H.1175 | Health Insurance Coverage | Pending | Requires certain insurers to provide coverage for screening breast ultrasound or screening breast magnetic resonance imaging examination if the patient has additional risk factors for breast cancer including, but not limited to, family history and positive genetic testing. Carries over to 2022. |
New York | 2021 State Bills New York 2021 A3709 | Privacy | Pending | Grants a consumer a right to request a business to disclose the categories and specific pieces of personal information such as biometric information that it collects about the consumer, the categories of sources from which that information is collected, the business purposes for collecting or selling the information, and the categories of third parties with which the information is shared. Biometric information is defined to include an individual's deoxyribonucleic acid. Carries over to 2022. |
Massachusetts | 2021 State Bills Massachusetts 2021 S.697 | Health Insurance Coverage | Pending | Requires certain insurers to provide coverage for screening breast ultrasound or screening breast magnetic resonance imaging examination if the patient has additional risk factors for breast cancer including, but not limited to, family history and positive genetic testing. Carries over to 2022. |
New York | 2021 State Bills New York 2021 S567 | Privacy | Pending | Grants a consumer a right to request a business to disclose the categories and specific pieces of personal information such as biometric information that it collects about the consumer, the categories of sources from which that information is collected, the business purposes for collecting or selling the information, and the categories of third parties with which the information is shared. Biometric information is defined to include an individual's deoxyribonucleic acid. Carries over to 2022. |
Minnesota | 2021 State Bills Minnesota 2021SF 248 | Other Topics | Pending | Requires the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy to establish a pharmacogenomics task force to evaluate and assess the current availability of pharmacogenomics statewide and to develop recommendations for making |
Hawaii | 2021 State Bills Hawaii 2021 SB 1009 | Privacy | Pending | Amends the definition of personal information for the purpose of applying modern security breach of personal information law. Personal information is defined as an identifier in combination with one or more specified data elements. Specified data elements include a deoxyribonucleic profile. Carries over to 2022 session. |
Minnesota | State StatuteMinnesota: MS 176.138 | Other Topics, Privacy | Statute | Medical data collected, stored, used, or disseminated by or filed with the commissioner in connection with a claim for workers' compensation benefits does not constitute genetic information for the purposes of �13.386 of the statutes pertaining to genetic privacy. |
Oklahoma | State StatuteOklahoma: OS 36-4502 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Group accident and sickness policies may not treat genetic information as a pre-existing condition or base eligibility or continued eligibility of any individual on health-status-related factors, including genetic information. |
Delaware | State StatuteDelaware: Del. Code 18 3571M, 3572, 3602, 3611, and 7202 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health status-related factor is defined to include genetic information with respect to large group health plans, individual health plans and small employer health insurance. Group health insurers may not establish rules for eligibility of an individual to enroll based on a health status related factor. Individual health insurers may not establish rules for eligibility of an individual to enroll under the terms of the coverage based on a health status-related factor. |
Maine | State StatuteMaine: MRS 26 3205 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | Conforms the Maine Apprenticeship Program to the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972. Requires a posting of statement that the apprentice will be accorded equal opportunity in all phases of apprenticeship employment and training, without discrimination because of various factors, including genetic information. |
New Hampshire | State StatuteNew Hampshire: NHS 420-G:6 and 420-G:7 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Health carriers may not establish rules of eligibility or continued eligibility for health coverage based on health status related factors of any employee or dependent, including genetic information, or impose a pre-existing condition exclusion based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. |
Virginia | State StatuteVirginia: Code of Va. 32.1-162.16. | Research | Statute | Requires informed consent to conduct human research. Requires institutions or agencies conducting or proposing to conduct or authorize human research to establish a human research review committee. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Civil Code 1102.6g | Other Topics | Statute | Prohibits any person or other entity whose business includes performing appraisals of residential real property from discriminating against any person in making available those services, or in the performance of those services, because of various characteristics, including genetic information. Requires every contract for the sale of real property to contain a notice regarding improper or illegal considerations such as genetic information in appraisal of property. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Health and Safety Code 1358.24, and Insurance Cod… | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | An issuer of a Medicare supplement contract must adhere to the requirements imposed by the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-233). |
Montana | State StatuteMontana: MCA 33-18-901 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Research | Statute | An insurer, health service corporation, health maintenance organization, fraternal benefit society, or other issuer of an individual or group policy or certificate of insurance may not discriminate based on a persons genetic traits. These entities also may not underwrite or condition coverage on a requirement or agreement to take a genetic test or on genetic information of an individual or his or her family member, and they may not seek genetic information for a purpose that is unrelated to assessing or managing ones health, inappropriate in an asymptomatic individual, or unrelated to research in which a subject is not personally identifiable. These entities may not require an individual to obtain a genetic test also with some exceptions. The law does not apply to life, disability income or long-term care insurance. |
South Dakota | State StatuteSouth Dakota: SDCL 60-2-20 and 21 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | An employer may not to seek to obtain, obtain, or use genetic information of a current or prospective employee discriminate or restrict any right or benefit otherwise due or available to an employee or a prospective employee. A few exceptions are provided such as if the employer uses the test results for the limited purpose of taking disciplinary action against the employee based only on alleged misconduct. Any employee or prospective employee claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful employment practice may bring a civil suit. |
Florida | State StatuteFlorida: FS 627.4301, 636.0201, and 641.438 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Insurers offering health insurance, a self-insured plan, a multiple employer welfare arrangement, a prepaid limited health service organization, a health maintenance organization, a prepaid health clinic, a fraternal benefit society or any health care arrangement where risk is assumed may not cancel, limit, or deny coverage or establish differentials in premium rates based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. Health insurers may not require or solicit genetic information, use genetic test results, or consider a person's decisions or actions relating to genetic testing for any insurance purpose. |
Maryland | State StatuteMaryland: Md. Insurance Code 27-909, and Md. Health-General Code 1… | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy, Research | Statute | An insurer, nonprofit health service plan, or health maintenance organization, which does not include life insurance policies, annuity contracts, long-term care insurance policies, or disability insurance policies, may not (1) use a genetic test, the results of a genetic test, genetic information, or a request for genetic services to affect a health insurance policy or contract, (2) request or require a genetic test, the results of a genetic test, or genetic information for certain purposes, or (3) release identifiable genetic information or the results of a genetic test except for internal business and to a participating health care provider without prior written authorization. Disclosure of identifiable genetic information to an employee or authorized health care provider may only be for the purpose of providing medical care to patients or conducting research approved by an institutional review board established in accordance with federal law. The insurance commissioner has the authority to issue orders where a violation is found. |
New York | State StatuteNew York: NYCL (CVR) 48 et seq. | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | Unless it can be clearly shown that a person's unique genetic disorder, defined to include the sickle cell trait, carriers of Tay-Sachs, and carriers of Cooleys anemia only, would prevent a person from performing the particular job, no person who is otherwise qualified may be denied equal opportunities to obtain or maintain employment or to advance in position in his job solely because a person has a unique genetic disorder. |
Wisconsin | State StatuteWisconsin: WSA 111.31 et seq. , 942.07 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | An employer, labor organization or employment or licensing agency may not (1) solicit, require or administer a genetic test to any person as a condition of employment, labor organization membership or licensure or affect the terms, conditions or privileges of employment, labor organization membership or licensure; (2) terminate the employment, labor organization membership or licensure of any person who obtains a genetic test; or (3) require or administer a genetic test without the prior written and informed consent of the employee, labor organization member or licensee, or of the prospective employee, labor organization member or licensee, who is the subject of the test. No person may disclose to an employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency that an employee, labor organization member or licensee, or a prospective employee, labor organization member or licensee, has taken a genetic test, and no person may disclose the results of such a test to an employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency without the prior written and informed consent of the subject of the test. |
Massachusetts | State StatuteMassachusetts: MGL Public Health 111 70G | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy, Research | Statute | Genetic information contained in reports or records held by hospitals, laboratories, physicians, insurance institutions and others named in the statute may not be divulged without informed written consent with some exceptions, which include in connection with life, disability, and long term care insurance, as allowable, or as confidential research information for use in epidemiological or clinical research conducted for the purpose of generating scientific knowledge about genes or learning about the genetic basis of disease or for developing pharmaceutical and other treatments of disease. Additional provisions concerning the performance of genetic tests apply to laboratories and other facilities. Organizations conducting pharmoco-economic studies in systematic research to determine the cost benefits of specific treatment for genetic based disease are exempt from the need to re-obtain informed consent. A person whose rights have been violated may bring a civil action. |
North Dakota | State StatuteNorth Dakota: NDCC 25-17-07 | Use of Residual Newborn Screening Specimens | Statute | A person that conducts research on blood spots, other specimens, or registry data maintained by the health department must follow IRB processes for human subjects research, including obtaining parent or guardian authorization. |
Colorado | State StatuteColorado: CRS 6-23-101 et seq. | Other Topics | Statute | Prohibits direct primary health care providers from discriminating in the selection of patients on the basis of genetic information and other protected classes. |
Louisiana | State StatuteLouisiana: LRS 22:1028.1 | Health Insurance Coverage | Statute | Requires health plans to cover the cost of the genetic testing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to detect an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer when recommended by a healthcare provider in accordance with the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. |
Nevada | State StatuteNevada: NRS 610.020 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | genetic_discrimination with regard to apprenticeship agreements is prohibited. Requires the Office of Workforce Innovation to suspend for one year the right of any employer, association of employers or organization of employees acting as agent for an employer to participate in a program under the provisions of apprenticeship program after notice and hearing, finds that the employer, association or organization has discriminated against an individual based on genetic information. |
Last updated: February 8, 2024