Bettie Graham retires after over 50 years of federal service
Dr. Graham reflects on her contributions to the scientific community, her retirement and the future of the genomics workforce.
Anna Rogers: How has NHGRI changed over your career?
Bettie Graham: My research had been in virology, and genomics didn't really exist yet when I arrived at NIH. When genomics first started, we at NHGRI were the ones supporting most of the research in a significant way. But now, genomics has really spread throughout the NIH and other agencies. Now, I would say that every institute, center and office is very much involved in genomics. That's a good thing when you can seed an effort and then really see it take off.
Rogers: What are some accomplishments from your career that you are most proud of?
Graham: One example is as a grants associate, I was encouraged to take an assignment outside of NIH. I went to the US Agency for International Development of the State Department, which was in the process of having a really serious meeting with experts from Sub-Saharan Africa and the World Health Organization about the elimination of malaria.
In two months there, I developed a resource document for a meeting held in Abidjan, Ivory Coast with a lot of health offices from Sub-Saharan Africa and staff from the WHO and the US AID staff. This experience pulled from my Peace Corps experience, so the meeting went off very well. Everybody went home and all excited about doing something. Not expecting anything to happen soon, I returned to NIH to continue my career as a program director.
But in June of 2007, I got an email from the current medical officer at the WHO office in Geneva, Switzerland, informing me that he was again reading the document that I had prepared 28 years before and that he found it very comprehensive and useful.
I had left an inscription at the end of the document, stating, "I have enjoyed this project and, in optimism, hope that it will be tremendously helpful to those for whom it is intended." The current medical officer wanted me to know that indeed it was, even after all these years. It was great to hear this news, but yet very sad since things have not changed significantly.
Rogers: What are your hopes for the future of genomics research and training?
Graham: I think we've tried to really make sure that we have a workforce that is diverse, but it's been very, very slow. I'm saddened by that because it’s one area that I've not been able to have any real impact on when you think about the numbers, but I'm not giving up.
I think there's lots of hope, even though there are some issues that training programs can't easily address, like how some students can afford to do internships without being paid or can afford to go to graduate school without having to worry about if they will make enough money and whether their families will be taken care of. Many graduate school stipends are not sufficient to live on, and there are many families who can't supplement or subsidize their children’s education.
Years ago, I looked at some National Science Foundation data that showed that many minority students who matriculate into graduate school do not finish, so if we could only retain the number that we admit, that would have a huge effect on changing the face of the workforce. I don't know how to fix these issues, but I really believe these are areas we need to look at more if we are serious about diversifying the workforce.
Rogers: Do you have any advice for trainees in genomics?
Graham: Do the best you can. Whether you're in graduate school or an undergrad, if you have problems understanding something, don't be afraid to ask questions.
And maintain connections with the people you work with and your mentors. It’s important to find mentors who will guide you through this morass of going from a trainee to a successful researcher. Effective mentors should look at each person as an individual and reach out to them and provide them with whatever is missing.
These connections can support you and provide you with opportunities to take the next steps in your career, and you can't buy a book that'll tell you about these kinds of things. You have to know people, because every situation is different.
Rogers: What are your plans for retirement?
Graham: Right now, I don't have any firm plans. I delayed retirement because I like my job and I didn’t know what else I’d do, but my goal is to find something that I enjoy doing and that’s also impactful.
Nothing is set in stone, but one of the things I have been looking at is teaching kids to read. If a kid can't read by the 3rd grade, they’re lost to the system, and we need everybody in this community functioning at the highest level they can. All of us are in this together, so we each need to find a way to help out.
Last updated: January 11, 2024