Genome Statute and Legislation Database
The Genome Statute and Legislation Database is comprised of state statutes and bills introduced during the 2002-2024 U.S. state legislative sessions.
State | Primary Link | Topic(s) | Bill Status Sort descending | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|
New Jersey | State StatuteNew Jersey: NJS 17B:30-12 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | No person may discriminate against an individual based on genetic information or the refusal of a genetic test with respect to hospital confinement or other supplemental limited benefit insurance. No person may make or permit any unfair discrimination against an individual in the application of the results of a genetic test or genetic information with respect to life insurance, including credit life insurance, an annuity, disability income insurance contract or credit accident insurance coverage, and, if results of a genetic test as permitted by these entities, the insurer must notify the individual who is the subject of the test that it is required and obtain the individual's prior written informed consent. The insurance commissioner has the authority to enforce these provisions. |
Virginia | State StatuteVirginia: Code of Va. 38.2-3431 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | In the statutes pertaining to group health plans, health status-related factors are defined to include genetic information, and pre-existing condition exclusion may not be based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Insurance Code 10146 et seq. | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Tests for genetic characteristics may not be required to determine insurability for life and disability income insurance except for policies contingent on review or testing for other diseases and conditions and only with informed consent. Policies may only limit benefits otherwise payable if loss is caused or contributed to by the presence or absence of genetic characteristics if the insurer imposes limitations for other medical conditions that present an increased risk. A life or disability income insurer may not request a genetic test to determine eligibility for hospital, medical or surgical insurance coverage or coverage under a nonprofit hospital service or health care service plan. The statutes set forth civil and criminal penalties for violations. |
Minnesota | State StatuteMinnesota: MS 181.974 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | Employers or employment agencies may not administer a genetic test or request, require, or collect protected genetic information as a condition of employment or affect the terms or conditions of employment or terminate the employment of any person based on protected genetic information. A person may not provide or interpret genetic information on a current or prospective employee for an employer or employment agency. An aggrieved person may bring a civil action. |
Connecticut | State StatuteConnecticut: CGA 46a 60 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | It is a discriminatory practice for an employer, an employment agency, or for any labor organization to request or require genetic information from an employee, a person seeking employment or a member. These entities may not discharge, expel or otherwise discriminate against any person on the basis of genetic information. |
Iowa | State StatuteIowa: IC 729.6 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | An employer, employment agency, labor organization, licensing agency, or its employees, agents, or members may not solicit, require or administer a genetic test as a condition of employment, application, membership or licensure or affect the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, application, membership, or licensure, of a person who obtains a genetic test. A person may not sell or interpret genetic tests for the above entities except with informed written consent for the purpose of workers compensation or biomonitoring of workplace toxins. Agreements between parties regarding pay or benefit for taking a genetic test are prohibited. The law may be enforced through civil action. |
Montana | State StatuteMontana: MCA 33-22-514 and 33-22-526 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group health_insurance_coverage may not impose a pre-existing condition exclusion based on genetic information. A group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group health_insurance_coverage may not establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility of any individual to enroll under the terms of the group health plan based on health status-related factors, including genetic information. |
Tennessee | State StatuteTennessee: TC 49-1-702 | Privacy | Statute | Schools must obtain written informed consent from a parent, legal guardian, or student, if the student is 18 years of age or older, before the collection of individual student biometric data, including DNA. The law also establishes additional protections for personally identifiable information, which includes biometric data, maintained by schools. |
Arkansas | State StatuteArkansas: Ark. Code 23-66-320 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Insurers except those offering life, disability income and long-term care plans may not request or require an individual or family member to obtain a genetic test for the purpose of determining eligibility, establishing premiums, limiting, renewing or terminating coverage, or another other underwriting activity or condition a policy on an individual taking a genetic test. |
Iowa | State StatuteIowa: IC 514J.101 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health carrier to notify a covered person of the right to request an external review and include appropriate statements and information in the written notice of a final adverse decision. Health carriers also must include with the notice an authorization form or other document developed by the state that complies with the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. |
Maryland | State StatuteMaryland: Md. Insurance Code 15-1A-06 ,15-1201, 15-1301 and 15-1401 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Prohibits health insurers, health maintenance organizations, nonprofit health insurance plan or any person or organization that provides health benefits plans from excluding or limiting certain benefits or denying certain coverage based on a health-status related factor, including genetic information. Health status-related factors also may not be used to (1) cancel or refuse to renew a small employer group plan or individual health plans; (2) establish rules for eligibility; or (3) charge higher premiums than similarly situated individuals in a group health plan. |
New York | State StatuteNew York: NYCL (CVS) 115 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | Declares that it is the policy of the state and all its political subdivisions to ensure a fair, non-biased compensation structure for all employees. Status within one or more protected class or classes may not be considered directly or indirectly in determining proper compensation or pay for any individual or group of employees, and no employee with status within one or more protected class to classes may be paid a wage at a rate less than the rate at which an employee without status within the protected class or classes in same establishment is paid for similar work. |
Wisconsin | State StatuteWisconsin: WSA 631.89 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | An insurer offering group health_insurance_coverage may not use genetic information as the basis for a pre-existing condition exclusion in the absence of a diagnosis or establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility based on health status-related factors, including genetic information. An insurer with respect to a self-insured health plan, or a county, city, village or school board that provides health care services for individuals on a self-insured basis, may not (1) require or request any individual or a member of the individual's family obtain a genetic test or reveal whether a test was taken or the results or (2) condition coverage or health care benefits on or use in the determination of rates whether an individual or his/her family member has taken a genetic test or what the results of the test were. Life insurance or income continuance insurers are not subject to the above provisions but may not provide rates or aspects of coverage that are contrary to the risk involved. |
Florida | State StatuteFlorida: FS 626.9706 et seq. | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Insurers may not refuse to issue or deliver any policy of life insurance or disability insurance that affords certain services and benefits or impose a higher premium rate or charge for those policies solely because the person to be insured has the sickle-cell trait. |
Louisiana | State StatuteLouisiana: LRS 22:1054.1 | Health Insurance Coverage | Statute | Requires coverage of cancer treatment targeting a specific genetic mutation. Prohibits a health coverage plan from denying coverage for the treatment of a metastatic or unresectable tumor with a medically necessary drug on the sole basis that the drug is not indicated for the location in the body of the patient's cancer, if the drug is FDA approved for the treatment of the specific mutation of the patient's cancer. Requires health_insurance_coverage for annual MRI at age 25 and annual mammography at age 30 for women with a hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer based on pathogenic mutation carrier status. |
Nevada | State StatuteNevada: NRS 613.345 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, a labor organization or an employment agency to (1) ask or encourage a prospective or current employee or member of the labor organization to submit to a genetic test, (2) require or administer a genetic test to a person as a condition of employment or membership, or (3) deny, alter the terms, conditions or privileges of, or terminate employment or membership based on genetic information. |
Utah | State StatuteUC 26-18-25 | Health Insurance Coverage | Statute | Requires the Medicaid program to reimburse for exome sequencing for undiagnosed enrollees under the age of 21. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Government Code 12920 et seq.and 11135 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | These statute sections contain provisions from 2011 CA SB 559, referred to as CalGINA. The opportunity to seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination because of genetic information, is recognized as a civil right. It is an unlawful employment practice, unless based on a bonafide occupational qualification, to subject any employee, applicant or other person to a test for the presence of a genetic characteristic. In addition, a person in the State of California may not, on the basis of genetic information, be unlawfully denied full and equal access to the benefits of, or be unlawfully subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity that is conducted, operated, or administered by the state or by any state agency, is funded directly by the state, or receives any financial assistance from the state. |
Michigan | State StatuteMichigan: MCL 333.5431 | Use of Residual Newborn Screening Specimens | Statute | The statute requires the health department to develop a schedule for the retention and disposal of blood specimens. The schedule must allow for the blood specimens to be used for medical research during the established retention period, as long as the medical research is conducted in a manner that preserves the confidentiality of the test subjects and is consistent to protect human subjects from research risks under subpart A of part 46 of subchapter A of title 45 of the code of federal regulations. |
North Dakota | State StatuteNorth Dakota: NDCC 26.1-36.3-01, 26.1-36.3-06 and 26.1-36.4-03.1 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Health benefit plans covering small employers and group policies of hospital and medical insurance may not treat genetic information as a pre-existing condition in the absence of a diagnosis. A health status-related factor is defined to include genetic information in the chapter of the law pertaining to small employer employee health insurance. |
Minnesota | State StatuteMinnesota: MS 62A.31 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Research | Statute | An issuer of a Medicare supplement policies or certificates may not deny or condition the issuance or effectiveness of insurance, including pre-existing condition exclusions, on the basis of genetic information. These entities also may not discriminate with respect to pricing on the basis of genetic information; request or require an individual or family member to undergo a genetic test; or use the manifestation of disease in an individual as genetic information about another group member and to further increase premiums for the group. Insurers may request a genetic test from an individual or family member only if the request is pursuant to research that applies to the Common Rule and other criteria are met. |
Rhode Island | State StatuteRhode Island: RIGL 28-6.7-1 et seq. | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | An employer, employment agency, or licensing agency may not (1) request, require or administer a genetic test, (2) affect the terms, conditions, or privileges of or terminate employment or licensure of any person who obtains a genetic test, (3) take any other action affecting the terms, conditions or privileges of employment against an employee or a license holder based on the results of a genetic test or the refusal to take a genetic test, submit family history, or reveal whether the employee, applicant or holder has taken a genetic test, (4) otherwise use genetic information to adversely affect the employment, licensure, or application for employment or licensure of any individual, or (5) reveal genetic information about employees, licensees, or applicants. Penalties for violations are set forth. |
Arizona | State StatuteArizona: ARS 12-2801 et seq. | Privacy, Research | Statute | Information derived from genetic testing my only be released to the person tested or others with written authorization from the person tested with some exceptions, including but not limited to (1) a researcher for medical research and public health purposes, only if the research is conducted pursuant to applicable federal or state laws and regulations, (2) if the identity of the individual providing the sample is not disclosed to the person collecting and conducting research; or (3) a third person if approved by a human subjects review committee or human ethics committee, with respect to persons who are subject to a state cancer registry. The law also places restrictions on disclosure or compelling disclosure, requires consent from a parent or legal guardian of a minor to conduct genetic testing other than newborn screening, and requires written informed consent for genetic testing by health care providers with some exceptions. |
Idaho | State StatuteIdaho: IC 72-438 | Other Topics | Statute | If a firefighter is diagnosed with breast cancer after five years of employment, and the disease was not revealed during an initial employment medical screening examination, then the disease is presumed to be proximately caused by the firefighter's employment as a firefighter. The presumption applies to breast cancer diagnosed before the age of forty (40) years and when a breast cancer 1 or breast cancer 2 genetic predisposition is not present. |
Maine | State StatuteMaine: 5 MRSA 7070 | Privacy | Statute | Personal information, including genetic information, pertaining to state employees is confidential and not open to public inspection. An employee may examine records containing personal information when permitted or required by law. |
New Jersey | State StatuteNew Jersey: NJS 10:5-43 et seq. | Privacy, Research | Statute | A person may not (1) obtain genetic information from an individual or from an individual's DNA sample or (2) retain an individuals genetic information without prior informed consent with some exceptions, including for anonymous research where the identity of the subject will not be released. A DNA sample from an individual who is the subject of a research project must be destroyed promptly upon completion of the project or withdrawal of the individual from the project unless consent to retain the sample is provided. Additional provisions address retention and disclosure. The statutes set forth civil and criminal penalties for violations. |
Virginia | State StatuteVirginia: Code of Va. 40.1-120.1 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | Prohibits a sponsor of a registered apprenticeship program from discriminating against an apprentice or applicant for apprenticeship on the basis of various factors, including genetic information. |
Colorado | State StatuteColorado: CRS 10-16-02 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Health-status related factor is defined to include genetic information in Title 10 Article 16, which pertains to health care coverage. |
District of Columbia | State StatuteDC Official Code 2-1401.01 et seq. | Employment Nondiscrimination, Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Employers, employment agencies and labor organizations may not discriminate based on genetic information with some exceptions such as to investigate a workers' compensation claim. A health benefit plan or health insurer may not establish rules for the eligibility or adjust premium or contribution amounts for an individual on the basis of genetic information concerning the individual or his/her family member, including information about a request for or receipt of genetic services by an individual or the individual's family member. Health insurers also may not require or request a genetic test. |
Iowa | State StatuteIowa: IC 507B.4, 513B.9A and 513B.10 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy, Research | Statute | Health insurers may not discriminate based on genetic information or tests. Authorization is required to obtain genetic information or samples. Consent requirements are established to collect, retain, transmit or use genetic information. Exceptions under consent requirements include medical or scientific research and eduction and for use in medical repositories and registries if it does not contain personally identifiable information. Health insurers may not release genetic information without prior written authorization. Exceptions for release requirements include (1) if an individual is participating in research settings, including those governed by the federal policy for the protection of human subjects, and (2) tests conducted purely for research. A carrier or organized delivery system offering group health_insurance_coverage may not establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility based on a health status-related factors, including genetic information, or impose a pre-existing condition exclusion based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. |
Nebraska | State StatuteNebraska: NRS 44-7,100 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Any hospital, medical, or surgical expense-incurred policy or certificate and self-funded employee benefit plan to the extent not preempted by federal law may not require a covered person or his or her dependent or an asymptomatic applicant for coverage or his or her asymptomatic dependent to undergo any genetic test before issuing, renewing, or continuing the policy or certificate. This does prohibit requiring an applicant for coverage to answer questions concerning family history. |
Tennessee | State StatuteTennessee: TC 56-7-2701 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | An insurance provider may not deny or cancel health_insurance_coverage or vary the premiums, terms, or conditions for health_insurance_coverage for an individual or his or her family member on the basis of a request or receipt of genetic services. An insurer may not request or require an individual to whom it provides health_insurance_coverage or an applicant to disclose to the insurer genetic information about the individual or family member of the individual. Life insurance, disability income, long-term care, accident only, hospital indemnity or fixed indemnity, dental or vision policies are exempt from the law. |
Arkansas | State StatuteArkansas: Ark. Code 23-79-140 | Health Insurance Coverage | Statute | Accident and health insurance companies, hospital service corporations, health maintenance organizations, or other accident and health insurance providers must offer coverage, as an essential health benefit, for mammogram screening, mammography and breast ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast disease. Coverage is required upon the recommendation of a physician without regard to age when a woman has (1) a prior history of breast cancer, (2) her mother or sister has a history of breast cancer, (3) positive genetic testing, or (4) other risk factors. |
Maryland | State StatuteMaryland: Md. State Government Code 10-13A-01 et seq. | Privacy | Statute | Requires the University of Maryland to develop and adopt an information security and risk management program for the protection of personally identifiable information. Personally identifiable information is defined to include biometric information such as an individual's DNA. Not effective until 10/1/2024. |
New York | State StatuteNew York: NYCL (EDN) 2e and (STT) 106-b | Privacy | Statute | Directs the director of the office of information technology services to conduct a study on the use of biometric identifying technology. Prohibits the use of biometric identifying technology in schools until July 1, 2022 or until the commissioner of education authorizes such purchase or utilization, whichever occurs later. Biometric identifier is defined to include a DNA sequence. |
Wyoming | State StatuteWyoming WSA 35-31-101 et seq. | Privacy | Statute | The law prohibits the collection, retention and disclosure of genetic information without informed consent with some exceptions such as for law enforcement purposes, newborn screening and anonymous research. An individual may inspect, correct and obtain retained genetic information. A person conducting genetic analysis must destroy an individual's genetic information upon request. Genetic information about an individual obtained for purposes exempt from consent requirements may only be used for the purposes obtained and must be destroyed or returned to the individual upon completion of use or in accordance with law. |
Florida | State StatuteFlorida: FS 627.6561 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | An insurer that offers a group health insurance policy may not establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility based on certain health status-related factors, including genetic information or use genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis as the basis for a pre-existing condition exclusion. |
Louisiana | State StatuteLouisiana: LRS 22:1061 and1063 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A group health plan, and a health insurance issuer offering group health_insurance_coverage may not use genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis as the basis for a pre-existing condition exclusion or establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility based on a health status-related factor, including genetic information. |
Nevada | State StatuteNevada: NRS 629.101 et seq. | Privacy, Research | Statute | It is unlawful to obtain any genetic information of a person without informed consent with some exceptions, including for use in a study where the identities of the persons from whom the genetic information is obtained are not disclosed to the person conducting the study. It is unlawful to retain genetic information that identifies a person without first obtaining the informed consent with some exceptions. Except as otherwise provided, a person who obtains the genetic information for use in a study must destroy that information upon completion of the study or withdrawal of the person from the study. Criminal penalties and a right to civil action are established for violations. |
Utah | State StatuteUtah: UC 26-45-101 et seq. | Employment Nondiscrimination, Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy | Statute | An employer may not in connection with a hiring, promotion, retention, or other related decision access or (1) take into account genetic information, (2) request or require an individual to consent to release genetic information, (3) submit to a genetic test, or (4) inquire or take into account that an individual or blood relative of that person has taken a genetic test. An employer may compel disclosure of genetic information for specified reasons. A health care insurer may not in connection with the offer or renewal of an insurance product or in the determination of any underwriting decision access or otherwise (1) take into consideration private genetic information about an asymptomatic individual, (2) request or require an asymptomatic individual to consent to a release for the purpose of accessing private genetic information, (3) request or require an asymptomatic individual or his blood relative to submit to a genetic test, or (4) inquire into or otherwise take into consideration the fact that an asymptomatic individual or his blood relative has taken or refused to take a genetic test. An individual whose rights have been violated bring civil action. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Health and Safety Code 124975 et seq. | Use of Residual Newborn Screening Specimens | Statute | All testing results and personal information from hereditary disorders programs obtained from any individual, or from specimens from any individual, is confidential and is considered a confidential medical record except for information that the individual, parent, or guardian consents to be released, provided after being fully informed of the scope of the information requested to be released, of all of the risks, benefits, and purposes for the release, and of the identity of those to whom the information will be released or made available, except for data compiled without reference to the identity of any individual, and except for research purposes, provided that pursuant to the Common Rule The research must first be reviewed and approved by an IRB. The health department, any entities approved by the department, and researchers must maintain the confidentiality of patient information and blood samples in the same manner as other medical record information with patient identification and may use it only for approved research to (1) identify risk factors for children's and women's diseases;(2) research to develop and evaluate screening tests;(3) research to develop and evaluate prevention strategies; and (4) research to develop and evaluate treatments. The State Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS) must determine if all of the if specified criteria are met for purposes of ensuring the security of a donor's personal information, before any blood samples are released pursuant for research purposes. |
Michigan | State StatuteMichigan: MCL 500.2212c | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy | Statute | The law requires a workgroup to develop a standard prior written authorization methodology for prescribers. If the workgroup develops a paper form, it must allow an insurer to request and require additional information beyond the form. Additional information may include patient clinical information regarding genetic tests. |
Ohio | State StatuteOhio: ORC 1751.65 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health insuring corporation may not (1) cancel or fail to renew the coverage because of any health status-related factor, including genetic information, (2) require an individual seeking coverage to submit to genetic screening or testing or taken into account or inquire about such testing, (3) make a decision adverse to the applicant based on entries in medical records or other reports of genetic screening or testing, or (4) cancel or refuse to issue or renew coverage for health care services based on the results of genetic screening or testing, or (6) limit benefits of an individual or group policy, contract, or agreement based on the results of genetic screening or testing. A violation of these provisions is an unfair and deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance. Further provisions apply upon the repeal of the current protections, which are in effect until February 9, 2014. |
Minnesota | State StatuteMinnesota: MS 62V.06 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy | Statute | The law requires the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace to provide any data subject asked to supply private data with a notice of rights related to the handling of genetic information. The Minnesota Insurance Marketplace is a state health benefit exchange as described in section 1311 of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), and further defined through amendments to the act and regulations issued under the act. |
Rhode Island | State StatuteRhode Island: RIGL 27-18-52, 27-18-52.1, 27-19-44, 27-19-44.1, 27-… | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy, Research | Statute | Insurance administrators, health plans and providers of accident and sickness insurance, nonprofit hospital corporations, nonprofit medical service corporations, and HMOs are prohibited from releasing genetic information without prior written authorization. Individuals participating in research settings governed by the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human research Subjects are exempt. Tests conducted purely for research are excluded from the requirements set forth, as are tests for somatic (as opposed to heritable) mutations, and testing for forensic purposes. An individual or group health insurance contract, plan or policy (excluding disability income, long term care and insurance supplemental policies) may not use a genetic test or genetic information or request for genetic tests or genetic information or the results of a genetic test for specified purposes, including for underwriting. Provisions pertaining to the release the results of a genetic test or genetic information do not apply to releases in a format whereby individual identifiers are removed, encrypted, or encoded so that the identity of the individual is not disclosed. Authorization is required for each re-disclosure except for participating in research settings governed by the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human research Subjects. |
Arizona | State StatuteArizona: ARS 20-1051 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health care services organization may not cancel an enrollee's evidence of coverage issued on a group basis because of criteria specified in the statutes, including such health status-related factors. Genetic information is a health status-related factor. |
Idaho | State StatuteIdaho: IC 41-2221, 41-3940, and 41-4708 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | General managed care plans and health benefit plans covering large and small employers may not treat genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis as a pre-existing condition. |
Maryland | State StatuteMaryland: Md. Commercial Code 14-3501 et seq. | Privacy | Statute | The law requires businesses to establish certain protections when using personal information. Personal information is defined to include an individual's genetic print. |
New Jersey | State StatuteNew Jersey: NJS 10:5-5 and 10:5-12(a) | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | It is an unlawful employment practice to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge or require to retire from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment based on genetic information or because of the refusal to submit to a genetic test. |
Virginia | State StatuteVirginia: Code of Va. 40.1-28.7:1 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | An employer may not request, require, solicit or administer a genetic test as a condition of employment or refuse to hire, fail to promote, discharge or otherwise adversely affect any terms or conditions of employment of any employee or prospective employee solely on the basis of a genetic characteristic or the results of a genetic test, regardless of how the employer obtained such information or results. An employee may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction over an employer who took adverse action against the employee. |
Last updated: February 8, 2024