Genome Statute and Legislation Database
The Genome Statute and Legislation Database is comprised of state statutes and bills introduced during the 2002-2024 U.S. state legislative sessions.
State | Primary Link | Topic(s) | Bill Status Sort descending | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|
Washington | 2021 State Bills Washington 2021 HB 1346 | Health Insurance Coverage | Pending | Requires an osteopathic physician and, physician, physician's assistant and advanced registered nurse practitioner to refer a person who is 18 years of age or younger to a children's specialty health care facility that can provide specialized diagnostic services, including genetic testing, unless the person is currently receiving care in such a facility, if the person has experienced any neurological or physical symptoms, including but not limited to seizures or missing developmental milestones. Requires a health carrier must provide coverage for genetic testing including up to a full genome panel as determined by the ordering practitioner to identify potential causes of seizures, neurological symptoms, or other physical symptoms as determined by the health care provider in persons who are 18 years of age or younger. Carries over to 2022. |
Massachusetts | 2021 State Bills Massachusetts 2021 H. 4152 | Privacy | Pending | Establishes protections relative to the processing of personal data and the free movement of personal data. Prohibits the processing of genetic data or biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person with certain exceptions. Carries over to 2022. |
New York | 2021 State Bills New York 2021 S6681 | Employment Nondiscrimination, Other Topics | Pending | Declares that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for a hiring party to subject a model to harassment based on various characteristics, including predisposing genetic characteristics. Carries over to 2022. |
Michigan | 2021 State Bills Michigan 2021 SB 327 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Pending | Requires an employer that employs 50 or more individuals at any time during the calendar year at a single work site in the state to inform employees of, and keep posted at the work site in a conspicuous place where employees may conveniently read it, a notice that includes specified information. Required notification includes a statement that it is illegal under federal law to pay employees different wages for the same work based solely on various characteristics, including genetic information. Carries over to 2022. |
Minnesota | Minnesota HB 1520 | Lab Developed Tests | Pending | Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies required to provide disclosure notices and obtain consent. |
New York | 2021 State Bills New York 2021 A460 | Employment Nondiscrimination, Other Topics | Pending | Declares that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for a hiring party to subject a model to harassment based on various characteristics, including predisposing genetic characteristics. Carries over to 2022. |
Massachusetts | 2021 State Bills Massachusetts 2021 H.2304 | Other Topics | Pending | Creates a pancreatic cancer advisory council within the health department. Requires the commissioner of insurance to survey health insurers in the commonwealth to ascertain coverage benefits of genetic testing for pancreatic cancer across health insurance plans, and present findings to the committee on health care financing and the committee on financial services no later than June 30, 2022. Carries over to 2022. |
Washington | 2021 State Bills Washington 2021 HB1433 | Privacy | Pending | Creates a charter of people's personal data rights. Establishes the rights of an individual with regard to personal information. Prohibits a person or legal entity processing captured personal information in a manner that discriminates against consumer on the basis of various characteristics, including predisposing genetic characteristics. Carries over to 2022. |
California | California SB 625 | Neonatal sequencing | Pending | Newborn screening: genetic diseases: blood samples collected. |
New York | 2021 State Bills New York 2021 S6701 | Privacy | Pending | Enacts the NY privacy act to require companies to disclose their methods of de-identifying personal information such as biometric information, to place special safeguards around data sharing and to allow consumers to obtain the names of all entities with whom their information is shared. Biometric information is defined to include DNA. Carries over to 2022. |
Michigan | 2021 State Bills Michigan 2021 HB 4581 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Pending | Requires an employer that employs 50 or more individuals at any time during the calendar year at a single work site in the state to inform employees of, and keep posted at the work site in a conspicuous place where employees may conveniently read it, a notice that includes specified information. Required notification includes a statement that it is illegal under federal law to pay employees different wages for the same work based solely on various characteristics, including genetic information. Carries over to 2022. |
New Hampshire | 2021 State Bills New Hampshire 2021 HB 597 | Privacy | Pending | Provides that an individual has an expectation of privacy in personal information, including content and usage, given or available to third-party providers of information and services, including cellular and land-line telephone, electric, water, and other utility services; Internet service providers; cable television providers; streaming services; social media providers; email service providers; banks and financial institutions; insurance companies; and credit card companies. Prohibits municipal, county, state, or federal department, agency, employee, elected official, or contractors from acquiring, collecting, retaining, or using personal information, directly or indirectly, related to customers of third-party providers of information and services located in New Hampshire except under certain circumstances. Personal information is defined to include genetic profiles and DNA/RNA data. Hearing on 3/05/2021. Carries over to 2022. |
South Carolina | 2021 State Bills South Carolina 2021 HB 3063 | Privacy | Pending | Enacts the South Carolina Biometric Data privacy Act. Provides certain requirements for a business that collets a consumer's biometric information. Allows consumers to: (1) request the deletion of collected biometric information; and (2) prohibit the sale of biometric information. Prohibits a business from discriminating against a consumer who opts out of the the sale of biometric information. Biometric information includes DNA. Carries over to 2022. |
New York | 2021 State Bills New York 2021 A592 | Other Topics | Pending | Establishes a genetics advisory council. Requires a preliminary report to the governor and legislature before March 1, 2023 and a final report by December 1, 2023 on issues relating to genetic counseling, genetic testing and public education. Carries over to 2022. |
Massachusetts | 2021 State Bills Massachusetts 2021 H.4029 | Privacy | Pending | Establishes requirements for specified persons, partnerships or corporations that maintain high-risk information systems. A high-risk information system involves the personal information of a significant numbers of consumers regarding various characteristics, including genetic data. Carries over to 2022. |
Washington | 2021 State Bills Washington 2021 SB 5062 | Privacy | Pending | Prohibits a data controller from processing sensitive data concerning a consumer without obtaining the consumer's consent or, in the case of the processing of sensitive data of a known child, without obtaining consent from the child's parent or lawful guardian, in accordance with the children's online privacy protection act requirements. Data controllers must conduct and document a data protection assessment of processing activities involving personal data, including sensitive data such as genetic data. Carries over to 2022. |
Minnesota | State StatuteMinnesota: MS 144.125 | Use of Residual Newborn Screening Specimens | Statute | During the period in which residual newborn screening specimens is retained, the health department may use blood samples and test results for newborn screening program operations. Newborn screening operations are defined to specifically exclude research, public health studies, or the development of new newborn screening tests. |
Oklahoma | State StatuteOklahoma: OS 36-3614.3 | Privacy | Statute | A person who maintains genetic information may not be compelled to disclose the information except under specified circumstances. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Civil Code 56.265 | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A person who underwrites or sells an annuity contract or contracts insuring, guaranteeing, or indemnifying against loss, harm, damage, illness, disability, or death, and any affiliate of that person or entity, shall not disclose individually identifiable information concerning the medical or genetic history of a customer for use with regard to granting credit. |
Maine | State StatuteMaine: MRS 24A 2204 | Privacy | Statute | The Insurance Information and privacy Protection Act defines health care information to include information about individual cells or their components or genetic information. |
New Hampshire | State StatuteNew Hampshire: NHS 141-H:1, 141-H:4, and 141:H-6 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health insurer in connection with providing health insurance may not (1) require or request an individual or family member to undergo genetic testing, whether a test was taken or the results of the testing, (2) condition the provision of health_insurance_coverage or health care benefits on whether an individual or family member has undergone genetic testing or the results of the testing, or (3) consider in the determination of rates or any other aspect of health_insurance_coverage or benefits whether an individual or family member has undergone genetic testing or the results of the testing. The statutes establish a right to civil action by aggrieved individuals. |
Vermont | State StatuteVermont: VSA 8 4724 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | It is an unfair method of competition or unfair and deceptive act or practice to (1) make or permit any unfair discrimination against any individual by conditioning insurance rates, the provision or renewal of insurance coverage, or other conditions of insurance based on the results of genetic testing where there is not a relationship between the information and the cost of the insurance risk that the insurer would assume by insuring the proposed insured or (2) to violate the Title 18 � 9334. |
Florida | State StatuteFlorida: FS 448.075 et seq. | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | No person, firm, corporation, unincorporated association, state agency, unit of local government, or any public or private entity shall deny or refuse employment to any person or discharge any person from employment solely because such person has the sickle-cell trait. These entities also may not require screening or testing for the sickle-cell trait as a condition for employment. |
Arizona | State StatuteArizona: ARS 1-602 | Privacy | Statute | Parents must consent in writing before any record of the minor child's blood or deoxyribonucleic acid is created, stored or shared, with some exceptions such as newborn screening. |
Idaho | State StatuteIdaho: IC 41-1313 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | With respect to disability insurance or any health benefit plan, no person may discriminate on the basis of a genetic test or private genetic information in the issuance of coverage or the fixing of rates, terms or conditions. |
Missouri | State StatuteMissouri: MRS 376.450, 376.451, 379.930, and 379.940 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health insurance issuer offering group health_insurance_coverage may not establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility of any individual to enroll under the terms of the group health plan based on health status-related factors, including genetic information, or impose a pre-existing condition exclusion based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. A small employer carrier may apply reasonable criteria in determining whether to accept a small employer into a class of business, provided that the criteria are not based on a health status-related factor, including genetic information. |
South Dakota | State StatuteSouth Dakota: SDCL 34-14-21 et seq. | Privacy | Statute | Informed written consent consisting of the information specified in the statute is required prior to ordering a predictive genetic test. The person to be tested must receive a signed copy of the form, which also must be placed in the medical record. Tests performed per a court order or for a criminal investigation are exempt. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Insurance Code 10146 et seq. | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Tests for genetic characteristics may not be required to determine insurability for life and disability income insurance except for policies contingent on review or testing for other diseases and conditions and only with informed consent. Policies may only limit benefits otherwise payable if loss is caused or contributed to by the presence or absence of genetic characteristics if the insurer imposes limitations for other medical conditions that present an increased risk. A life or disability income insurer may not request a genetic test to determine eligibility for hospital, medical or surgical insurance coverage or coverage under a nonprofit hospital service or health care service plan. The statutes set forth civil and criminal penalties for violations. |
Maryland | State StatuteMaryland: Md. Insurance Code 18-120 | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Long-term care insurers may not request or require a genetic test to deny or limit the amount, extent, or kind of coverage available; charge a different rate for the same coverage; or use a genetic test, the results of a genetic test, genetic information or a request for genetic services to deny or limit the amount, extent, or kind of coverage available or charge a different rate for the same insurance except that the results of a genetic test may be used for these purposes based on sound actuarial principles. |
New York | State StatuteNew York: NY Public Health Code 2440 et seq. | Research | Statute | The law safeguards the rights and welfare of individual human subjects in the conduct of human research projects and provides protections against the possible conduct of medical or psychological research without voluntary informed consent. |
West Virginia | State StatuteWest Virginia: WVC 18-2-5h | Privacy | Statute | The Department of Education must prohibit the collection of confidential student information, including genetic information. The Department may not transfer student or redacted data that is confidential except under specified circumstances. |
Arkansas | State StatuteArkansas: Ark. Code 23-66-320 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Insurers except those offering life, disability income and long-term care plans may not request or require an individual or family member to obtain a genetic test for the purpose of determining eligibility, establishing premiums, limiting, renewing or terminating coverage, or another other underwriting activity or condition a policy on an individual taking a genetic test. |
Iowa | State StatuteIowa: IC 514J.101 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health carrier to notify a covered person of the right to request an external review and include appropriate statements and information in the written notice of a final adverse decision. Health carriers also must include with the notice an authorization form or other document developed by the state that complies with the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. |
Kentucky | State StatuteKentucky: KRS 61.931 et seq. | Privacy | Statute | Public agencies and nonaffiliated third parties must implement, maintain, and update security procedures and practices to safeguard personal information, including a biometric or genetic print. |
Nebraska | State StatuteNebraska: NRS 77-5518, 5519, 5534 and 5537 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | In order for a company to be eligible for the wage benefit credit or the investment tax credit under the Invest Nebraska Act, the company must file an application for an agreement with the board, which must contain a copy of the written policy of the company prohibiting the company, as required by law, from requiring as a condition of employment or promotion at the project that an employee or an individual applying for employment at the project submit to a genetic test or provide genetic information outside of the scope of normal blood testing. |
Texas | State StatuteTexas: TS (Labor) Code 301.156 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | The Texas Workforce Commission collects and reports on complaints of employment discrimination, including those related to the use of genetic information. |
Connecticut | State StatuteConnecticut: CGA 46a 60 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | It is a discriminatory practice for an employer, an employment agency, or for any labor organization to request or require genetic information from an employee, a person seeking employment or a member. These entities may not discharge, expel or otherwise discriminate against any person on the basis of genetic information. |
Massachusetts | State StatuteMassachusetts: MGL 176M 1 and 176J 1 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Genetic information may not be treated as a pre-existing condition in the absence of a diagnosis under the definitions for chapter 176M on nongroup health plans and 176J on small group health insurance. |
North Carolina | State StatuteNorth Carolina: NCGA 58-3-215, 58-51-45, 58-51-95, 58-65-70, 58-68… | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health benefit plan, health maintenance organization or multiple employer welfare arrangement may not raise the premium or contribution rates paid for a group health benefit plan, refuse to issue or deliver a health benefit plan, or charge a higher premium rate or charge because of genetic information. Health benefit plans must comply with all applicable standards of the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Insurers providing accident and sickness policies or hospital, medical, or dental health service may not refuse to issue or deliver any policy that affords benefits or coverage for any medical treatment or service authorized or permitted by specified entities or carry a higher premium rate or charge by reason of the fact that the person to be insured possesses sickle cell trait or hemoglobin C trait. A group health insurer may not establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility based on a health status-related factor, including genetic information, or treat genetic information as a pre-existing condition in the absence of a diagnosis. An individual health insurer may not increase an individual's renewal premium for continued health_insurance_coverage based on a health statusrelated factors, including genetic information. A sponsoring association of an employee welfare benefit program may not condition eligibility for coverage, including continuing eligibility for coverage, on health status related factors such as genetic information. |
Minnesota | State StatuteMinnesota: MS 144.192 | Privacy, Research | Statute | The health commissioner may collect, use, store, and disseminate biological specimens and health data to conduct research in a manner that is consistent with the federal common rule for the protection of human subjects in Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, part 46. Biological specimens is defined as tissue, fluids, excretions, or secretions that contain human DNA originating from an identifiable individual, either living or deceased. |
Oklahoma | State StatuteOklahoma: OS 36-3614.4 | Research | Statute | The statutes related to research apply to genetic research studies approved by an institutional review board as defined in 21 CFR, � 50 or conducted subject to the requirements of the federal common rule at 21 CFR, � 50 and � 56, and 45 CFR, � 46. research records are confidential and may not be disclosed to employers or health insurers without informed consent. The provision does not apply to an insurer or to an individual dealing with an insurer in the course of underwriting, conducting or administering life, disability income or long-term care insurance. Stored tissues, including blood, that arise from surgery, other diagnostic or therapeutic steps, or autopsy may be disclosed for genetic or other research studies with informed consent. Results of genetic research studies may be published if no individual subject is identified. |
California | State StatuteCalifornia: Cal. Government Code 12920 et seq.and 11135 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | These statute sections contain provisions from 2011 CA SB 559, referred to as CalGINA. The opportunity to seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination because of genetic information, is recognized as a civil right. It is an unlawful employment practice, unless based on a bonafide occupational qualification, to subject any employee, applicant or other person to a test for the presence of a genetic characteristic. In addition, a person in the State of California may not, on the basis of genetic information, be unlawfully denied full and equal access to the benefits of, or be unlawfully subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity that is conducted, operated, or administered by the state or by any state agency, is funded directly by the state, or receives any financial assistance from the state. |
Maine | State StatuteMaine: MRS 24A 2850 and 24A 2850-C | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | An individual, group and blanket medical insurance contract subject to chapters 33 and 35 of Title 24A (with some exceptions) may not impose pre-existing condition exclusions based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. Group medical insurance contracts subject to chapter 35 of Title 24A (with some exceptions) may not establish rules for eligibility of an individual to enroll or require an individual to pay a premium or contribution that is greater than that for a similarly situated individual, based on genetic information. |
New Hampshire | State StatuteNew Hampshire: NHS 141-H:1,141-H:5, and 141:H-6 | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A person in the business of providing life, disability income, or long-term care insurance who obtains information about genetic testing of an individual or a family member may not use that information in writing a type of insurance coverage other than life, disability income, or long-term care insurance. An aggrieved individual may bring a civil action. |
Vermont | State StatuteVermont: VSA 9 2430 et seq. | Privacy | Statute | Requires (1) the State Court Administrator for the Judicial Branch; (2)the Director of Information Technology for the Legislative Branch; and (3) the Chief Data Officer within the Agency of Digital Services and the Chief Records Officer within the Office of the Secretary of State for the Executive Branch to conduct a data privacy inventory for their respective branches of government. The inventory must address the collection and management of personally identifiable information, including genetic information. Requires a report to the legislature on or before January 15, 2021. |
Florida | State StatuteFlorida: FS 626.9706 et seq. | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Insurers may not refuse to issue or deliver any policy of life insurance or disability insurance that affords certain services and benefits or impose a higher premium rate or charge for those policies solely because the person to be insured has the sickle-cell trait. |
Arizona | State StatuteArizona: ARS 12-2801 et seq. | Privacy, Research | Statute | Information derived from genetic testing my only be released to the person tested or others with written authorization from the person tested with some exceptions, including but not limited to (1) a researcher for medical research and public health purposes, only if the research is conducted pursuant to applicable federal or state laws and regulations, (2) if the identity of the individual providing the sample is not disclosed to the person collecting and conducting research; or (3) a third person if approved by a human subjects review committee or human ethics committee, with respect to persons who are subject to a state cancer registry. The law also places restrictions on disclosure or compelling disclosure, requires consent from a parent or legal guardian of a minor to conduct genetic testing other than newborn screening, and requires written informed consent for genetic testing by health care providers with some exceptions. |
Idaho | State StatuteIdaho: IC 72-438 | Other Topics | Statute | If a firefighter is diagnosed with breast cancer after five years of employment, and the disease was not revealed during an initial employment medical screening examination, then the disease is presumed to be proximately caused by the firefighter's employment as a firefighter. The presumption applies to breast cancer diagnosed before the age of forty (40) years and when a breast cancer 1 or breast cancer 2 genetic predisposition is not present. |
Montana | State StatuteMontana: MCA 33-18-206 | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Unfair discrimination between individuals of the same class and equal expectation of life in any contract of life insurance or of life annuity is prohibited. Unfair discrimination between individuals of the same class and of essentially the same hazard for disability insurance is prohibited. An insurer may not refuse to consider an application for life or disability insurance on the basis of a genetic condition. The rejection of an application or the determining of rates, terms, or conditions of a life or disability insurance contract is permissible if the applicant's medical condition and history as well as either claims experience or actuarial projections establish that substantial differences in claims are likely to result from the genetic condition. |
South Dakota | State StatuteSouth Dakota: SDCL 58-1-24, 58-1-25, 58-17-84, 58-18-45, 58-18-87,… | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination, Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination, Privacy | Statute | A health carrier, long-term care insurer or life insurer from requiring or requesting an individual or his/her blood relative to take a genetic test or consider the fact that a genetic test was refused in determining eligibility for coverage, establishing premiums, limiting coverage, renewing coverage, or any other underwriting decision in connection with the offer, sale, or renewal of health insurance. The insurance director may promulgate rules concerning genetic information and group health benefit plans. In individual, group and blanket health insurance plans, genetic information may not be treated as a pre-existing condition in the absence of a diagnosis. Small employer carriers may not establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility based on a health status-related factor, including genetic information. Prohibits any company providing genetic testing directly to a consumer from sharing any genetic test, genetic information, or other personally identifiable information of a consumer with any health carrier, life insurer, or long-term care insurer without written consent from the consumer. A company that provides genetic testing may communicate with a health carrier for the purposes of payment, coordination of medical treatment, or patient care so long as such communication is compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and only used for the purposes permitted. |
Last updated: February 8, 2024