Genome Statute and Legislation Database
The Genome Statute and Legislation Database is comprised of state statutes and bills introduced during the 2002-2024 U.S. state legislative sessions.
State | Primary Link | Topic(s) | Bill Status Sort descending | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alaska | State StatuteAlaska: AS 21.54.100 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Health care insurers in the group market may not establish rules for eligibility or continued eligibility based on genetic information or impose preexisting condition exclusions based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. |
Idaho | State StatuteIdaho: IC 39-8301 et seq. | Employment Nondiscrimination, Privacy | Statute | An employer may not (1) access or otherwise take into account private genetic information, (2) request or require consent to a release of private genetic information, (3) request or require a genetic test, or (4) inquire about taking or refusal to take a genetic test in connection with a hiring, promotion, retention or other related decision. An exception is made under certain circumstances for an order compelling disclosure of private genetic information. |
Arkansas | State StatuteArkansas: Ark. Code 20-35-101 et seq. | Privacy, Research | Statute | No individual records of subjects in genetic research studies approved by an institutional review board or conducted subject to the requirements of the federal common rule may be subpoenaed or subject to discovery in civil suits except in cases where the information in the records is the basis of the suit. These records may not be disclosed to an insurer or employer without the informed written consent of the subject. Stored tissues, including blood, that arise from surgery or other diagnostic and therapeutic steps may be disclosed for genetic or other research studies if the patients name or social security number is not attached to or included with the specimen. Identifying information may be disclosed with the informed written consent of the individual. Published results may not identify a subject unless the individual has provided specific informed consent. |
Indiana | State StatuteIndiana: IC 27-4-1-4 and 27-8-26-1 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Every accident and sickness policy, contract through which an HMO furnishes health care, government self-insured health care plan, and employee welfare benefit plan may not (1) require a genetic screening or testing; (2) consider screening or testing information in a manner adverse to member, applicant or their family members; (3) inquire about genetic screening or test results, use or base a decision on such information to cancel, refuse to issue, renew or enter into a contract, limit benefits, or charge higher premiums under health care services coverage; or (4) make an adverse decision about applicants or their family based genetic testing or screening results in medical records or other reports. An insurer may consider voluntarily submitted genetic test results if they are favorable. A violation of the law is an unfair method of competition deceptive act and practice in the business of insurance. |
Kentucky | State StatuteKentucky: KRS 304.17A-259 | Health Insurance Coverage | Statute | Requires health benefit plans to cover any genetic test for cancer risk recommended by a physician, physician's assistant, genetic counselor or nurse if the recommendation is consistent with genetic testing guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. |
Nebraska | State StatuteNebraska: NRS 44-6910 et seq. | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | A health benefit plan may not treat genetic information as a pre-existing condition in the absence of a diagnosis. A health carrier may not establish rules for eligibility and continued eligibility of any individual to enroll under the terms of the health benefit plan based on a health status-related factor, including genetic information. |
Texas | State StatuteTexas: TS (Labor) Code 21.401-405 | Employment Nondiscrimination | Statute | It is an unlawful employment practice if an employer, labor organization, or employment agency discriminates against an individual on the basis of genetic information or refusal to submit to a genetic test. An employer, labor organization, or employment agency commits an unlawful employment practice if these entities limit, segregate, or classify an employee, member, or applicant in a way that would deprive or tend to deprive the employee, member, or applicant of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect the status of his or her status on the basis of genetic information or the refusal to submit to a genetic test. |
Connecticut | State StatuteConnecticut: CGA 38a 476 and 816 | Health Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | Any hospital and medical expense incurred policy, hospital or medical service plan contract and health care center subscriber contract providing individual or group health_insurance_coverage may not refuse to insure, continue to insure, limit coverage, or charge an individual a different rate because of genetic information. In this type of coverage and all health insurance plans pre-existing condition exclusions may not be based on genetic information in the absence of a diagnosis. |
Massachusetts | State StatuteMassachusetts: MGL 175 108I and 120 E | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | An insurer, agent or broker authorized to issue life insurance policies, policies against disability from injury or disease or policies for long-term care may not practice unfair discrimination because of the results of a genetic test or the provision of genetic information or require an applicant to undergo a genetic test as a condition of issuance or renewal of a policy. Unfair discrimination involves discriminatory practices against persons unless such action is based on reliable information relating to the insureds mortality or morbidity and based on sound actuarial principles or actual or reasonably anticipated claim experience. These insurers may ask if an applicant has taken a genetic test. |
North Carolina | State StatuteNorth Carolina: NCGA 58-58-25 | Other Lines of Insurance Nondiscrimination | Statute | No insurance company may refuse to issue or deliver any policy of life insurance solely by reason of the fact that the person to be insured possesses sickle cell trait or hemoglobin C trait. A policy also may not carry a higher premium rate or charge by reason of the fact that the person to be insured possesses these traits. |
Last updated: February 8, 2024